Saturday, March 24, 2007

Wow what a week!...

I'm sorry for not posting before now but things have been happening in my life as well as on the campaign. I think today instead of quoting a lot of people I don't know I'll just give you my take on JRE and the current events and what I suspect the future will be.

I have had so many thoughts go through my mind and so many emotions through my soul(my soul being that self I only share with me). It's funny how my first thoughts went to the Movie "The American President". I don't know how many of you have seen it, it stars Michael Douglas and Annette Bening. It deals with an embattled President who has lost a spouse at a young age. He has a school age daughter and must content with not only affairs of state but also of heart.

I was most impressed by a speech he gave at the end of the movie. It was great:

Reporter: Robyn, will the President ever respond to Senator Rumson's question about being a member of the American Civil Liberties Union?

President Shepherd: Yes, he will. Good morning. [Members of the White House Press Corps begin to rise] It's alright. Please keep your seats. Good morning.

For the last couple of months, Senator Rumson has suggested that being President of this country was, to a certain extent, about character. And although I've not been willing to engage in his attacks on me, I have been here three years and three days, and I can tell you without hesitation: Being President of this country is entirely about character.

For the record, yes, I am a card-carrying member of the ACLU, but the more important question is "Why aren't you, Bob?" Now this is an organization whose sole purpose is to defend the Bill of Rights, so it naturally begs the question, why would a senator, his party's most powerful spokesman and a candidate for President, choose to reject upholding the constitution? Now if you can answer that question, folks, then you're smarter than I am, because I didn't understand it until a few hours ago.

America isn't easy. America is advanced citizenship. You've gotta want it bad, 'cause it's gonna put up a fight. It's gonna say, "You want free speech? Let's see you acknowledge a man whose words make your blood boil, who's standing center stage and advocating at the top of his lungs that which you would spend a lifetime opposing at the top of yours." You want to claim this land as the land of the free? Then the symbol of your country cannot just be a flag. The symbol also has to be one of its citizens exercising his right to burn that flag in protest. Now show me that, defend that, celebrate that in your classrooms.

Then you can stand up and sing about the land of the free.

I've known Bob Rumson for years. And I've been operating under the assumption that the reason Bob devotes so much time and energy to shouting at the rain was that he simply didn't get it. Well, I was wrong. Bob's problem isn't that he doesn't get it. Bob's problem is that he can't sell it!

We have serious problems to solve, and we need serious people to solve them. And whatever your particular problem is, I promise you Bob Rumson is not the least bit interested in solving it. He is interested in two things, and two things only: making you afraid of it, and telling you who's to blame for it. That, ladies and gentlemen, is how you win elections. You gather a group of middle age, middle class, middle income voters who remember with longing an easier time, and you talk to them about family, and American values and character, and you wave an old photo of the President's girlfriend and you scream about patriotism. You tell them she's to blame for their lot in life. And you go on television and you call her a whore.

Sydney Ellen Wade has done nothing to you, Bob. She has done nothing but put herself through school, represent the interests of public school teachers, and lobby for the safety of our natural resources. You want a character debate, Bob? You better stick with me, 'cause Sydney Ellen Wade is way out of your league.

I've loved two women in my life. I lost one to cancer. And I lost the other 'cause I was so busy keeping my job, I forgot to do my job. Well, that ends right now.

Tomorrow morning the White House is sending a bill to Congress for it's consideration. It's White House Resolution 455, an energy bill requiring a twenty percent reduction of the emission of fossil fuels over the next ten years. It is by far the most aggressive stride ever taken in the fight to reverse the effects of global warming. The other piece of legislation is the crime bill. As of today, it no longer exists. I'm throwing it out. I'm throwing it out and writing a law that makes sense. You cannot address crime prevention without getting rid of assault weapons and hand guns. I consider them a threat to national security, and I will go door to door if I have to, but I'm gonna convince Americans that I'm right, and I'm gonna get the guns.

We've got serious problems, and we need serious people. And if you want to talk about character, Bob, you'd better come at me with more than a burning flag and a membership card. If you want to talk about character and American values, fine. Just tell me where and when, and I'll show up. This a time for serious people, Bob, and your fifteen minutes are up.

My name is Andrew Shepherd, and I AM the President.


The movie not only brought out the complications of a President trying to pick up the pieces of his life and still be the leader of the free world. It also brought out the wicked underbelly of Washington politics and how your opponent will use whatever you give them in order to achieve their goals.

As much as it pains me to think it, the possibility does exist that Elizabeth may not enjoy his second inauguration. There are many scenarios that could play out between now and election time and I have resolved to expect nothing but the best. Elizabeth Edwards is a fighter and I feel certain she will survive this to a ripe old age. I look forward to watching the successful two term President Edwards and his wife Elizabeth retire to their home in North Carolina and do good works for America as did another former President and First Lady.

But should fate intervene and disrupt this plan nothing will change my support for John Edwards for President.

Thursday, March 15, 2007

John Edwards and the working man

John Edwards is the working mans best friend. Having grown up in a working class family . His dad was a mill worker, Johns values oft time reflect mine. I can remember riding with my dad on his bread route as John used to go to the mill and watch his dad work. That instills a respect in you for the working man.
Senator Edwards voted many times for working mans legislation...

The Senator is a man who understands the workers right to a collective voice at their jobs, and has voted to protect the workers right to organize and have union representation...

Labor unions are vital for the future of American workers
We don't believe it's right that a man or woman could be fired from the job for trying to organize a union in the workplace, so that working people actually have a voice. And this is something I take very personally. My mother and father have health care today because of the unions. My younger brother is a card-carrying member of IBEW; he and his family have health care today because of the union. We need real labor law reform in this country.
Source: 2005 Take Back America Conference Jun 2, 2005


He also said...

Greater protection for unionization
I support job training programs, an increase in the minimum wage, greater protection for unionization, and greater help for Americans balancing work and families.
Source: 2004 Presidential National Political Awareness Test Mar 3, 2004


I really can't believe more people haven't picked up on this. John Edwards has actually had the courage to come out in favor of Unions, and in giving the working man more barganing power when it comes to dealing with the powerful managment legal machine...

Support unions; ban striker replacements
Labor has been a powerful force for good in this country and across the globe, and Edwards supports tougher penalties and stronger enforcement to protect workers' rights to organize and collectively bargain. Edwards also opposes permanent striker replacement because he believes we should not punish an employee with permanent job loss if he or she exercises a legally protected right to strike. Edwards has consistently earned high scores from labor unions for his votes on behalf of American workers
Source: Campaign website, johnedwards2004.com, "Key Issues" Jul 17, 2003



Senator John Edwards even voted to secure workers overtime protection...

Protect overtime pay protections.
Edwards signed a letter from 43 Senators to the Secretary of Labor

To: Labor Secretary Elaine Chao

Dear Secretary Chao:

We write to express our serious concerns about the Department's proposed regulation on white collar exemptions to the Fair Labor Standards Act. These sweeping changes could eliminate overtime pay protections for millions of American workers.

We urge you not to implement this new regulation that will end overtime protections for those currently eligible. Under current law, the FLSA discourages employers from scheduling overtime by making overtime more expensive. According to a GAO study, employees exempt from overtime pay are twice as likely to work overtime as those covered by the protections. Our citizens are working longer hours than ever before – longer than in any other industrial nation. At least one in five employees now has a work week that exceeds 50 hours. Protecting the 40-hour work week is vital to balancing work responsibilities and family needs. It is certainly not family friendly to require employees to work more hours for less pay.

Overtime protections clearly make an immense difference in preserving the 40-hour work week. Millions of employees depend on overtime pay to make ends meet and pay their bills for housing, food, and health care. Overtime pay often constitutes 20-25% of their wages. These workers will face an unfair reduction in their take-home pay if they can no longer receive their overtime pay.

We urge you not to go forward with any regulation that denies overtime pay protections to any of America's currently eligible hard-working men and women.
Source: Letter from 43 Senators to the Secretary of Labor 03-SEN4 on Jun 30, 2003



People I'm no blogger but I sure like writing about someone when I'm inspired and trust me this man inspires me...

Saturday, March 10, 2007

Gun control

The gun control debate has been divisive to say the least. There is nothing more passionate to a gun enthusiast than to hear someone mention that they should give up their guns. It has been a wedge issue used by the right wing in general and gun manufacturers specifically, every time a legislator tries to introduce a bill on gun legislation.

The second amendment reads.
Article the fourth [Amendment II][4]

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

or if you prefer.
Notes:


4. In the Congressional Statutes at Large, Vol. 1, Page 97, at http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=001/llsl001.db&recNum=220, the first and third commas are omitted, so that it reads:

A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.

The question remains open of where those additional, and grammatically spurious, commas came from, but they do not change the legal meaning of the provision, and it would not be erroneous to omit them.


http://www.constitution.org/billofr_.htm#04


The fact is that our founding fathers lived in a different time and under different circumstances. The continental congress had no provisions for an organized military and relied solely on the citizens to protect the country and themselves. It was a time of exploration and much of the country was wild and unsettled so that a man needed a gun to not only put food on the table but to protect them and their families from danger. A gun was very necessary for survival.

Today we are supposed to be a more civilized society but yet guns, and gun violence are a daily item on the evening news. New FBI statistics show an alarming increase in violent crime specifically having to do with guns. This in spite of what the gun lobby said as far as more guns in the hands of citizens would make criminals think twice about committing crimes. What I have said all along has come to fruition, the more guns in the hands of citizens means a bigger market for criminals possessing guns.

We now have concealed carry laws and laws designed to allow citizens to shot to kill without the risk of answering to their actions, but has it helped in decreasing crime? The statistics prove otherwise.

"Two years worth of double-digit increases in violent crime demonstrates an unmistakable change in the extent and the nature of crime in America," said Chuck Wexler, executive director of the nonprofit think tank that is funded in part by the Justice Department, as well as corporations and private foundations.

"There are those that say this is a statistical blip, an aberration," Wexler said. "After two years, this is no aberration."


http://news.aol.com/topnews/articles/_a/violent-crime-rises-in-big-cities/20070309064709990001

I support, as does John Edwards a persons right to own a gun for protection a hunters right to own a hunting weapon for hunting. However like all rights they come with responsibilities. Like John Edwards I also support laws that govern the sale, and accountability of all firearms and their owners. Senator Edwards has supported legislation, that I support, that would address my concerns and the concerns of all citizens and that is


Q: What federal gun control measures you would propose?

EDWARDS: I think we should extend the Brady Bill, which is set to expire. I think that we need to close forever the gun-show loophole, [to avoid criminals] buying a gun. I think it does make sense to have trigger locks for the purpose of keeping guns safe from children.

http://www.issues2000.org/2004/John_Edwards_Gun_Control.htm

Senator Edwards supports gun control that we can live with (pun intended) and that's why I support John Edwards for President.

Tuesday, March 6, 2007

An Anniversay

This weekend a good friend of mine will be going to Washington. He's a lawyer but not a politician. He probably should be a politician but I doubt the congress is ready for him yet.
He's going to acknowledge an anniversary, well two anniversaries to be exact. It was forty years ago this year that thousands of Americans organized to march on the Pentagon in protest of the Vietnam War...



March 17th marks the forth anniversary of the invasion of Iraq. Four years ago George W. Bush abused the authority that John Edwards and other members of congress gave him. They gave him the authority to find and bring to justice the perpetrators of the 9/11 attack on our country. They gave him the ability to use our armed forces to bring Osama bin Laden to justice. They gave him the power to track down, where ever they may be, the conspirators, who's cowardly act, brought down the World Trade Centers, and he abused it...

My friends will remember that march, 40 years ago, that brought about real change, that made people think. They will be marching on the Pentagon once again. The young the old. Men, women and children. As in the 60s they will be from all walks of life but all with the same purpose in mind, to bring an end to this unjust war. Some who participated way back then have died others have grown too old to be there but are there in spirit. I will have to sit this one out myself but appreciate those brave souls who will be marching on my behalf...

Senator Edwards may have voted for the war on terror but it didn't include a war on Iraq. The senator has said that he favors cutting funds for the war, but George Bush and Co. believe that more is better so instead of listening to the people of this country, the Generals, or the politicians, he wants to escalate this war. Thats what my friends are going to Washington to try and stop. Will it work? Couldn't hurt to try. Like someone told me the other day when I ask him to sign a petition for the environment, he said "even a futile gesture is better than silence, I suppose." I laughed and told him "they probably thought the same thing at Valley Forge"...

In closing I'd like to say if your not doing anything on the weekend of the 17th and want to get involved in stopping a war, my friends would welcome your company. Who knows you might make a couple thousand new friends...


BTW Buddy, give em hell for me... Onward!

http://answer.pephost.org/site/News2?abbr=ANS_&page=NewsArticle&id=8107

http://www.dawndc.net/float.php?annc_id=478§ion_id=1

http://encampmenttostopthewar.blogspot.com/


Get off your Duff and Get Involved!

Sunday, March 4, 2007

Something to think about.


Replay video | Share video | Watch more videos



I wrote this in my Democratic Underground Journal, before I asked them to delete my membership. I was inspired, at that time, by the unfair treatment of our working class, but it's a generic document and just reflects on think tanks in general:



Acebass's Journal
Whats in a word?...
Posted by Acebass in General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007)
Sun Apr 30th 2006, 04:43 PM
I often wondered, when I'd hear about them on the news, what are these conservative think-tanks, and what do they all sit around thinking about?...

First off I wish someone would pay me to just sit around and think but thats beside the point, conservative thing-tank, hm mm just let that soak in...

They think conservative thoughts and what could be wrong with that you say? Well when you look at what we have today you see the harm in letting conservatives think to hard in any one place for very long...

You see they didn't like the Unions, Unions meant that ordinary people could afford things on their own and wouldn't have to be subservient to the 'company' anymore. I can't say for sure just what was said but I'll bet they thought about Unions a lot. Then they devised a plan to discredit Unions make them seem greedy when they went on strike, "if your suffering then it's that damn Unions fault, if they'd get back to work you would have what you want." You never heard anyone rail at the company for not listening to the workers demands, it was always those lazy Union people that didn't want to work...

I remember a time when a man got paid a decent wage and could support his family without the wife working. We owe that to Unions for keeping the pay scale high enough for the working man to live. I can also remember talk of a four day work week, and a time when there was a middle class. I'll bet they thought a lot about that in those conservative think tanks...

I'll bet they also thought a lot about how to get the message to their millionaire friends while making it sound like they were talking to the average American. They've become pretty slick at that. Why they even had everyone believing they were going to cut their taxes when they really meant to cut just the rich peoples taxes. They had them believing that they would get government off our backs when they really meant off the backs of big business...

I will have to give them credit, their plan just about worked. I think people are finally seeing through it though, at least I hope so. You know it might not be a bad idea if we didn't let these folks sit around and think too much, it seems that when we do, we end up getting screwed in the end...


Either way, when a group of people, with the same agenda get together to form government policy. I think someone from "We the People" should be there to listen. Don't You?

Friday, March 2, 2007

Something on my mind...

I'm sitting here and I can't stop thinking about the movie "Born on The Fourth of July". That movie highlighted the treatment that soldiers like Ron Kovac received as a thank you for their service. I feel akin to Ron Kovac and like this except from his autobiography:
"I wrote all night long, seven days a week, single space, no paragraphs, front and back of the pages, pounding the keys so hard the tips of my fingers would hurt. I couldn't stop writing, and I remember feeling more alive than I had ever felt. Convinced that I was destined to die young, I struggled to leave something of meaning behind, to rise above the darkness and despair. I wanted people to understand. I wanted to share with them as nakedly and openly and intimately as possible what I had gone through, what I had endured. I wanted them to know what it really meant to be in a war -- to be shot and wounded, to be fighting for my life on the intensive care ward -- not the myth we had grown up believing. I wanted people to know about the hospitals and the enema room, about why I had become opposed to the war, why I had grown more and more committed to peace and nonviolence." — Ron Kovic

I hope to relay a story too.

Whats is going on in our VA hospitals right now is so reminicent of a time not long ago. That movie brought back memories. I can't and won't speak for the men and women who have had to go through a VA hospital on the way home from Nam, I was fortunate and have been able to put that war behind me, however many men and women still haven't made it home, and it's the system that's broken and needs fixing that has let them down.


I first read where they were getting rid of ;

WASHINGTON - The Army on Thursday fired the general in charge of Walter Reed Army Medical Center, saying he was the wrong person to fix embarrassing failures in the treatment of war-injured soldiers that have soiled the institution's reputation as a first-class hospital.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070302/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/walter_reed_14

And then I read this:

WASHINGTON — Army Secretary Francis J. Harvey abruptly stepped down Friday as the Bush administration struggled to cope with the fallout from a scandal over substandard conditions for war-wounded soldiers at Walter Reed Army Medical Center.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20070302/walter-reed


But getting rid of them isn't going to do anything for a system that is for all intents and puposes broken as these next articles will highlight.

Investigators found several problems in how agency officials formulated budget requests to Congress, including failure to accurately forecast the department's workload, unrealistic assumptions about savings that could be achieved from policy changes and calculation errors.

GAO confirmed VA's claim that part of the forecasting problem stemmed from using workload data from 2003, before American forces were heavily engaged in the Middle East. For its fiscal 2006 budget formulation the agency sought additional data from the Defense Department, but had trouble obtaining it, auditors found.


http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=35084&printerfriendlyVers=1&

They have their sacrificial lamb and maybe now that the spot light is on we'll get something done, but where will the money come from? How big of an actual deficit does the system have? This next article suggests that the White House, in 2001, increased the budget for veterans issues a record:

WASHINGTON, Feb. 7 /PRNewswire/ -- The White House today delivered to Congress the largest increase in discretionary spending for veterans ever proposed by any President -- $1.5 billion for 2001.

"With this budget, the President signals the Nation's continuing commitment to her veterans, their families and the selfless professionals within this Department who assist them," said Secretary of Veterans Affairs Togo D. West, Jr. "The median age of the Nation's veterans is about 58, and more than nine million are at least 65 years of age. As they age, their health-care requirements and the assistance they need from VA increase dramatically. The President's budget recognizes this and responds to it."

http://home.att.net/~vet_updates/vabudget.htm

the article states further:

VA's 2001 budget would provide $48 billion for the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1, 2000. It will fund benefits and services for millions of eligible veterans and family members. There are 25 million veterans and 44 million family members who are potentially eligible for VA benefits and services. The budget's priorities include:

* Improved access and service in health care to reduce appointment waiting times;

* Enhanced standards for patient safety;

* Full funding for new emergency and extended care benefits;

* Adding more than 1,000 claims processors since 1999;

* Funding for more federal and state veterans cemeteries;

* Preservation of national cemeteries as shrines to our veterans.


http://home.att.net/~vet_updates/vabudget.htm

Something went wrong, very wrong. Of course the Gulf War has come but this money never saw the light of day and I'll venture to say, was never intended to.

The Facts: While it is true that the VA health care budget is increased for FY 2004, the proposed
increase is insufficient to meet veterans’ medical needs. According to the American Legion, the
budget “comes $1.9 billion short of maintaining an inadequate status quo.”1 The combined
effects of medical inflation, which was 4.7% in 2002,2 and new enrollment, which is expected to
increase by 8% this year,3 consume most of the increase.
The budget does contain important initiatives to reduce waiting times and improve care for a
subset of veterans, mainly those with low incomes and service-related disabilities. But because
the overall level of funding is inadequate, the budget pays for these initiatives that benefit some
veterans by significantly cutting the medical care available for millions of other veterans. This
“rob Peter to pay Paul” policy is fundamentally wrong.


http://www.house.gov/larson/budget_factsheet_conf1.pdf

The problem isn't just at Walter Reed but is a system wide problem as is illistrated by this article:

The VA claims that by shifting funds dedicated to replace old equipment and conduct maintenance the department can address its budget shortfall and meet veterans’ demand for timely, high–quality health care. The following snapshots from across the nation reflect the stark reality of the budget shortfall on veterans’ access to safe, high quality care.



* The 3 surgical operating rooms at the White River Junction VAMC in Vermont had to be closed on June 27 because the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning system was broken and had not been repaired due to the siphoning of maintenance funds to cover the budget shortfall.



* The VAMC in San Antonio could not provide a paraplegic veteran with a special machine to help clean a chronic wound because the facility did not have the equipment dollars.



* The VAMC in Lebanon, Pennsylvania, closed its Geriatric Evaluation and Management Unit which does extensive case management to help elderly veterans increase their functioning and remain at home.


http://veterans.house.gov/democratic/budget/snapshot6-29-05.htm

These are just some of the problems facing not only our Veterans Healthcare system but healthcare in this country in general. It is a train wreck waiting to happen. I am one of those 58 year old veterans that may have to depend on the VA hospitals for my very life. I hope that I have shead some light on the problem and that we work expediciously to change the system, as well as the people running it.

Thursday, March 1, 2007

Greetings ...

Welcome to my blog "Veterans for John Edwards".

Veterans issues have been front and center since the 2004 campaign. We saw how vicious people can be and how they try to turn something of pride into something to shame. John Edwards has no military background and You can be certain that it will come up when he wins the Democratic nomination.

If John McCain wins the Republican nomination you can bet money on it that we will see more pictures of him shaking Nixons hand instead of him blowing up the USS Forrestal. The Republicans will Swiftboat him to death over that. I plan to use this blog to keep updates on Veterans issues. Positions and accomplishments JRE has made in the veterans behave.

His wife Elizabeth knows first hand what it's like in the military. Her father was a decorated Navy pilot and she grew up in a military atmosphere. As first lady I can see her working to help the VA hospital situation. I see her as more of an activist First Lady.

I know that as Sentor John Edwards:

Offered Bill to Offer Tax Help for Military in Hostile Areas, Help for Military Families. After a 1999 visit to Fort Bragg, he introduced legislation (S. 1424, 106th) to extend tax exemptions for military personnel in combat zones to members of the armed forces serving in other hostile areas designated by the Defense Department. The legislation grew out of meetings with the spouses of military service members deployed in Operation Allied Force, who asked why federal tax laws treated pay for duty in the Balkans combat zone differently than pay for other hazardous missions. John Edwards has continued his efforts to help military families as they deal with the stress of extended deployments and the ongoing War on Terror. He introduced legislation (S. 864, 108th) to give National Guard families financial help for child care in their hometown.

http://www.independentsforker
ry.org/info/index.php?category_id=1389

This blog is for all Veterans so please post your constructive comments. Since I know how salty some veterans can be, and after all I want this open to the public, I will reserve the right to post only those that are tasteful and constructive. After all we practice family values around here...